Casting the runes II

In Casting the runes, I highlighted the abject failure of OfQuack to reach even their ever-so-slightly modified 2009 membership target. Remember, it started out at 10,000. Then it was downsized to 4,000 — just five months after they opened for business — by re-writing their press release from the previous December. Then, in September, The Lay Scientist announced that their July Committee meeting minutes said they were planning a celebration in the Autumn when their membership was expected to reach the dizzy heights of just 2,000.

Well, now it’s the last day of 2009, how have they fared? For those following the OfQuack Fail widget, it’ll come as no surprise to find that they have failed — spectacularly.

The total at the end of 2009 was a measly1,267.


They have registrants in just five ‘disciplines’ (as they call them):

Discipline Number
Massage therapy 759
Reflexology 399
Nutritional therapy 136
Aromatherapy 124
Shiatsu 14
Total 1,432

Now, the more observant among you will have noticed that this total isn’t the same as the 1,267 I mentioned earlier. This is because some quacks have signed up to more than one discipline; the table of figures give the numbers signed up for each discipline. For example, there are 750 massage therapists who put that down as their first discipline and a further 9 others for whom massage isn’t the first one they registered with. They have 128 registrants who are registered in two disciplines, 36 in three disciplines and just one in four disciplines.

However, it’s 1,267 registrants that OfQuack have at the year end. Somewhat short of the 10,000 target. Or the 4,000 target. Or even the 2,000 target.

No party yet then.

But you never know — their fortunes may change in 2010. They will start accepting the next six disciplines any day now

However, if we extrapolate the current figures, it will be another seven months before they crack open the bubbly; another two years to breach the 4,000 barrier; and The Quackometer‘s new duckling will be well into Primary school before they get to their original 10,000 break-even target. Can they last that long?

What’s in store for 2010?

Not everything’s been doom and gloom in the world of regulating nonsense.

As I said previously, OfQuack at least appear to have handled Simon Perry’s 15 complaints professionally (other than their insistence that the fitness to practice of the complainees had not been affected by making false and misleading claims). They have stated that they will require all registrants stick to their Code of Conduct, Performance & Ethics and stop misleading the public with false promises. That’s what a good and effective regulator is supposed to do, isn’t it? Let’s hope other regulators (voluntary or otherwise) take a lead from them so the public is protected from misleading claims.

But the real question for OfQuack for 2010 is whether can they make any progress at all in 2010? What quack would want to join an organisation that prevents them making claims they have been making unchallenged for years? Do the (supposed) benefits of membership of OfQuack outweigh all those restrictions?

Perhaps if they added astrology and tea leaf reading to their list of disciplines, they’d have someone who could tell them if they even have a future, but I think we’ll just have to wait and see.

But it doesn’t take a psychic to see that 2010 is going to be an interesting year for quackery and its regulation.

2 thoughts on “Casting the runes II”

  1. While you are investigating the lack of evidence for alternative remedies I wonder if you might look at the use the same techniques in so called orthodox healthcare. For example, the use of acupuncture and manipulation in medicine and physiotherapy. Interestingly the yellow pages advertises aromatherapy, reflexology and Indian Head Massage being offered by local physiotherapy clinics. I wonder, is it only acceptable for members of the Health Professions Council to use these techniques? I noticed that the adverts carefully avoided suggesting what conditions these therapies are used for.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.