<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Now, what was that Section 60 Order all about again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/08/now-what-was-that-section-60-order-all-about-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/08/now-what-was-that-section-60-order-all-about-again/</link>
	<description>The random thoughts of a sceptical activist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 08:14:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Lanigan</title>
		<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/08/now-what-was-that-section-60-order-all-about-again/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Lanigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zenosblog.com/?p=71#comment-363</guid>
		<description>I saw that, those names were not on the GCC website yesterday. The chiropractors are tutors at the AECC and so would not be on your list. Being BCA would not preclude them from sitting on the IC as long as they did not know the chiropractors concerned.

 The BCA would have opposed the change on fees if they were not given assurances on the IC appointments. They would never have agreed to more McTimoney or UCA appointments.This is how the GCC operates, probably all regulators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that, those names were not on the GCC website yesterday. The chiropractors are tutors at the AECC and so would not be on your list. Being BCA would not preclude them from sitting on the IC as long as they did not know the chiropractors concerned.</p>
<p> The BCA would have opposed the change on fees if they were not given assurances on the IC appointments. They would never have agreed to more McTimoney or UCA appointments.This is how the GCC operates, probably all regulators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeno</title>
		<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/08/now-what-was-that-section-60-order-all-about-again/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zenosblog.com/?p=71#comment-362</guid>
		<description>I have all the time in the world...

The GCC have recently appointed two more chiropractors to their Investigation Committee: Aaron Coode and Amanda Jones-Harris. Both are at the Anglo European College of Chiropractic and both are members of the BCA. I wonder if they&#039;ll be investigating complaints against other BCA members?

They have also appointed one &#039;lay&#039; member, Helen Kitchen. She doesn&#039;t appear to be a chiropractor, but she does (or used to) work for Penningtons, one of the GCC&#039;s legal advisers.

I have more to say on this, but I&#039;ll blog on it later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have all the time in the world&#8230;</p>
<p>The GCC have recently appointed two more chiropractors to their Investigation Committee: Aaron Coode and Amanda Jones-Harris. Both are at the Anglo European College of Chiropractic and both are members of the BCA. I wonder if they&#8217;ll be investigating complaints against other BCA members?</p>
<p>They have also appointed one &#8216;lay&#8217; member, Helen Kitchen. She doesn&#8217;t appear to be a chiropractor, but she does (or used to) work for Penningtons, one of the GCC&#8217;s legal advisers.</p>
<p>I have more to say on this, but I&#8217;ll blog on it later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Lanigan</title>
		<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/08/now-what-was-that-section-60-order-all-about-again/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Lanigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zenosblog.com/?p=71#comment-361</guid>
		<description>What this means is the GCC can drag out the process for a long time without having to give up £600,000 of their income.
The GCC are banking on the fact you will loose interest and not spend the time making 600 individual complaints and they will drag it out. 
Right now the GCC does not have enough chiropractors to sit on the Investigating Committee to determine if there is a case to answer for one of your complaints never mind 600. 
If you hang in there, thats when it will get interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What this means is the GCC can drag out the process for a long time without having to give up £600,000 of their income.<br />
The GCC are banking on the fact you will loose interest and not spend the time making 600 individual complaints and they will drag it out.<br />
Right now the GCC does not have enough chiropractors to sit on the Investigating Committee to determine if there is a case to answer for one of your complaints never mind 600.<br />
If you hang in there, thats when it will get interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/08/now-what-was-that-section-60-order-all-about-again/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 11:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zenosblog.com/?p=71#comment-359</guid>
		<description>Very funny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very funny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/08/now-what-was-that-section-60-order-all-about-again/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zenosblog.com/?p=71#comment-358</guid>
		<description>Now that&#039;s an interesting thought, dizzyblonde!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that&#8217;s an interesting thought, dizzyblonde!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by jackofkent</title>
		<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/08/now-what-was-that-section-60-order-all-about-again/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by jackofkent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 10:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zenosblog.com/?p=71#comment-357</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by jackofkent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by jackofkent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dizzyblonde</title>
		<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/08/now-what-was-that-section-60-order-all-about-again/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>dizzyblonde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 06:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zenosblog.com/?p=71#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Hi Zeno, if you want some free entertainment&#039;, the GCC Council meeting is open to the public. Anyone can go along and witness procedings and get a full set of the papers before council. 

Wicklow St is near Kings Cross Station.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Zeno, if you want some free entertainment&#8217;, the GCC Council meeting is open to the public. Anyone can go along and witness procedings and get a full set of the papers before council. </p>
<p>Wicklow St is near Kings Cross Station.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
