<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking after personal data&#8230;or not? The UCA and the DPA.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/07/looking-after-personal-data-or-not-the-uca-and-the-dpa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/07/looking-after-personal-data-or-not-the-uca-and-the-dpa/</link>
	<description>The random thoughts of a sceptical activist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeno</title>
		<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/07/looking-after-personal-data-or-not-the-uca-and-the-dpa/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=42#comment-310</guid>
		<description>DavidP&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ICO produce a good &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/detailed_specialist_guides/160408_v1.0_determining_what_is_personal_data_-_quick_reference_guide.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;guide&lt;/a&gt; on how to determine what is &#039;personal data&#039; and therefore covered by the DPA. Although there are several criteria to be met, basically it is any data from which I can be idnetified as an individual and includes emails, whether live or on an archive or back-up system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DavidP</p>
<p>The ICO produce a good <a href="http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/detailed_specialist_guides/160408_v1.0_determining_what_is_personal_data_-_quick_reference_guide.pdf" rel="nofollow">guide</a> on how to determine what is &#39;personal data&#39; and therefore covered by the DPA. Although there are several criteria to be met, basically it is any data from which I can be idnetified as an individual and includes emails, whether live or on an archive or back-up system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidP</title>
		<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/07/looking-after-personal-data-or-not-the-uca-and-the-dpa/comment-page-1/#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=42#comment-309</guid>
		<description>G&#039;day Zero,&lt;br /&gt;Speaking from general IT knowleddge (I&#039;m in Australia, and don&#039;t know the UK&#039;s rules specifically), generally acts like the DPA cover data held in &quot;information systems&quot; which can be organised filing cabinets. The key is that the data is held in a way that it can be processed. Emails in someone&#039;s personal mail account, and references to you in letters filed under the sender&#039;s name should not count as data about you held by the organisation - otherwise it becomes an impossible burden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#39;day Zero,<br />Speaking from general IT knowleddge (I&#39;m in Australia, and don&#39;t know the UK&#39;s rules specifically), generally acts like the DPA cover data held in &quot;information systems&quot; which can be organised filing cabinets. The key is that the data is held in a way that it can be processed. Emails in someone&#39;s personal mail account, and references to you in letters filed under the sender&#39;s name should not count as data about you held by the organisation &#8211; otherwise it becomes an impossible burden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

