Comments on: The tale of the GCC and the ‘Section 60 Order’ http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-tale-of-the-gcc-and-the-section-60-order/ The random thoughts of a sceptical activist Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:01:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Libel laws and the BCA « Scinteralia's Blog http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-tale-of-the-gcc-and-the-section-60-order/comment-page-1/#comment-4836 Libel laws and the BCA « Scinteralia's Blog Sun, 18 Apr 2010 20:30:57 +0000 http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=37#comment-4836 [...] view, at this point the internet got angry. Some wonderful people got hold of this story and would not let it [...] [...] view, at this point the internet got angry. Some wonderful people got hold of this story and would not let it [...]

]]> By: jdc325 http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-tale-of-the-gcc-and-the-section-60-order/comment-page-1/#comment-293 jdc325 Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:30:03 +0000 http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=37#comment-293 DavidP notes that the GCC are still seemingly having difficulty with answering questions. This seems to be a historical problem. When I wrote to them they answered questions I hadn't asked and failed to answer the questions I <i>had</i> asked. I believe that Action for Victims of Chiropractic have had similar experiences with the GCC. DavidP notes that the GCC are still seemingly having difficulty with answering questions. This seems to be a historical problem. When I wrote to them they answered questions I hadn't asked and failed to answer the questions I had asked. I believe that Action for Victims of Chiropractic have had similar experiences with the GCC.

]]> By: DavidP http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-tale-of-the-gcc-and-the-section-60-order/comment-page-1/#comment-292 DavidP Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:16:02 +0000 http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=37#comment-292 I notice they are still not good at answering questions.<br />Two of your the items were<br />1. what this 'section 60 order' is<br />4. the full details of this request<br /><br />The reply you quote certainly does not include "the full details of this request", and Ms coates has described what a section 60 order is, but not what the order they requested would say.<br /><br />I think (but without the details of the requested order, who can be sure) that complaints will always have to be investigated by an investigating committee, but the investigating committee would have greater ability to reject a case as unlikely to succeed, or negotiate a response with the practitioner, without involving referral to a professional conduct committee. I notice they are still not good at answering questions.
Two of your the items were
1. what this 'section 60 order' is
4. the full details of this request

The reply you quote certainly does not include "the full details of this request", and Ms coates has described what a section 60 order is, but not what the order they requested would say.

I think (but without the details of the requested order, who can be sure) that complaints will always have to be investigated by an investigating committee, but the investigating committee would have greater ability to reject a case as unlikely to succeed, or negotiate a response with the practitioner, without involving referral to a professional conduct committee.

]]>