Comments on: The GCC respond: email #2 – we need copies of everything http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-gcc-respond-email-2-we-need-copies-of-everything/ The random thoughts of a sceptical activist Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:01:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Zeno http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-gcc-respond-email-2-we-need-copies-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-219 Zeno Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:27:46 +0000 http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=27#comment-219 ROFLMAO! Nice one, <i>Anonymous</i>. ROFLMAO! Nice one, Anonymous.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-gcc-respond-email-2-we-need-copies-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-218 Anonymous Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:20:56 +0000 http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=27#comment-218 Ha Ha..... just looked into where all the knicker twisting was coming from.... I googled zeno. <br /><br />guess what came up 1st? <br /><br /><br /> Zeno corporation... "Thermal Acne Blemish Device"<br /><br />and the slogan (gets better) "Improving lives through the science of heat!"<br /><br />Just wet my twisted knickers laughing! How ironic is that! Good on you zeno... you prat! Picked a wonderful name! Ha Ha….. just looked into where all the knicker twisting was coming from…. I googled zeno.

guess what came up 1st?

Zeno corporation… "Thermal Acne Blemish Device"

and the slogan (gets better) "Improving lives through the science of heat!"

Just wet my twisted knickers laughing! How ironic is that! Good on you zeno… you prat! Picked a wonderful name!

]]> By: Dr* T http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-gcc-respond-email-2-we-need-copies-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-134 Dr* T Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:05:07 +0000 http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=27#comment-134 Wow....descent into craziness!<br /><br />Just heard back from my complaint - they have offered me to speak with their solicitor in order to make a signed witness statement with regards the complaint. <br /><br />This is not compulsory, but it is part of the Rules (2000).<br /><br />T Wow….descent into craziness!

Just heard back from my complaint – they have offered me to speak with their solicitor in order to make a signed witness statement with regards the complaint.

This is not compulsory, but it is part of the Rules (2000).

T

]]> By: Somebody http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-gcc-respond-email-2-we-need-copies-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-131 Somebody Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:06:18 +0000 http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=27#comment-131 %&$^#*@ No they're not %&$^#*@ No they're not

]]> By: You http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-gcc-respond-email-2-we-need-copies-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-130 You Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:05:21 +0000 http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=27#comment-130 **** asterisks are directly proportional to the significance of the note writer **** asterisks are directly proportional to the significance of the note writer

]]> By: Me http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-gcc-respond-email-2-we-need-copies-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-129 Me Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:01:43 +0000 http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=27#comment-129 *** anyone who takes themselves so seriously without any good reason is hardly worth listening to anyway *** anyone who takes themselves so seriously without any good reason is hardly worth listening to anyway

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-gcc-respond-email-2-we-need-copies-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-128 Anonymous Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:30:24 +0000 http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=27#comment-128 MKG said<br /><br />"....anti-evidence chiro-quack-supporting wankers"<br /><br />"....FREAKIN' LYING C**T,"<br /><br />"....pathetic whinging wanking wally weed" <br /><br />and then <br /><br />Wich dovetails perfectly with your repellent juvenile debating tactics<br /><br />are you for real?<br /><br />I am sure Zeno is glad you are on his side (case). MKG said

"….anti-evidence chiro-quack-supporting wankers"

"….FREAKIN' LYING C**T,"

"….pathetic whinging wanking wally weed"

and then

Wich dovetails perfectly with your repellent juvenile debating tactics

are you for real?

I am sure Zeno is glad you are on his side (case).

]]> By: Michael Kingsford Gray http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-gcc-respond-email-2-we-need-copies-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-127 Michael Kingsford Gray Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:23:21 +0000 http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=27#comment-127 <em>Anonymous said...<br />Looks like it could all end up a waste though eh Zeno.<br />MKG, like you count more than billions of other humans, animals, plants, fungi that really keep the world living and the air fresh.<br />Well OK humans aren't quite there yet with keeping the air clean, but one day, one way or another, they will be.<br />Anonymous (the other one) ;)</em><br /><br />I don't care which 'anonymous' coward you claim to be,** but when your grade-school teachers advised you to post 'in coherent English', I'm pretty sure that you mis-heard.<br /><br />Smiley faces do not make up for incoherency.<br /><br />If you are able, can you reword your post such that it makes sense?<br />Perhaps you have something to which it is worth listening...<br /><br />__________________<br />** Anyone who hides behind a transient pseudonym without good reason is hardly worth listening to in any case. Anonymous said…
Looks like it could all end up a waste though eh Zeno.
MKG, like you count more than billions of other humans, animals, plants, fungi that really keep the world living and the air fresh.
Well OK humans aren't quite there yet with keeping the air clean, but one day, one way or another, they will be.
Anonymous (the other one) ;)

I don't care which 'anonymous' coward you claim to be,** but when your grade-school teachers advised you to post 'in coherent English', I'm pretty sure that you mis-heard.

Smiley faces do not make up for incoherency.

If you are able, can you reword your post such that it makes sense?
Perhaps you have something to which it is worth listening…

__________________
** Anyone who hides behind a transient pseudonym without good reason is hardly worth listening to in any case.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-gcc-respond-email-2-we-need-copies-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-126 Anonymous Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:47:34 +0000 http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=27#comment-126 Looks like it could all end up a waste though eh Zeno.<br />MKG, like you count more than billions of other humans, animals, plants, fungi that really keep the world living and the air fresh.<br />Well OK humans aren't quite there yet with keeping the air clean, but one day, one way or another, they will be.<br /><br />Anonymous (the other one) ;) Looks like it could all end up a waste though eh Zeno.
MKG, like you count more than billions of other humans, animals, plants, fungi that really keep the world living and the air fresh.
Well OK humans aren't quite there yet with keeping the air clean, but one day, one way or another, they will be.

Anonymous (the other one) ;)

]]> By: Michael Kingsford Gray http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/the-gcc-respond-email-2-we-need-copies-of-everything/comment-page-1/#comment-121 Michael Kingsford Gray Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:39:11 +0000 http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=27#comment-121 @Anonymous<br /><br />I'll wager that you do not <em>honestly</em> reveal your identity in the follow-up post.<br />For I have valiantly done so, and one may even determine my exact physical address, as well as photographic identification via a few simple Google searches.<br /><br />But, you see, because I tell the truth, I have nothing to fear through identification.<br />So, for me, it is a win/win situation.<br /><br />Yet you, as an anonymous FREAKIN' LYING C**T, have two competing fears:<br />1) a fear of the shame of not revealing your true identity<br /> and<br />2) the puerile fear contingent upon shame of revealing said identity,<br />and revealing to the blogosphere just what a pathetic whinging wanking wally weed that you really are.<br /><br />For you, it is a lose/lose situation.<br />Wich dovetails perfectly with your repellent juvenile debating tactics.<br /><br />OK, I assume that you are willing to make amends in the evidence department.<br /><br />I assign a task that is designed to cut your skeptical milk-teeth.<br />Critically analyse my following two consecutive posts:<br /><br />http://www.layscience.net/node/594#comment-39941<br />http://www.layscience.net/node/594#comment-39946<br /><br />Provide a reasoned response to the points raised.<br />Give peer-reviewed references and citations to every substantial claim of fact.<br />Give your real, verifiable identity.<br /><br /><br />If you do, I shall respect you, and may even convert to your way of thinking.<br />If you falter on a significant number of these tasks, then I shall assume that you remain a cowardly wanker who's only real grasp on anything is not reality.<br /><br />Its up to you. The ball is in your court.<br />I ask myself: is the anonymous (wo)man enough to rise to the challenge?<br /><br />(Stop giggling, Zeno) @Anonymous

I'll wager that you do not honestly reveal your identity in the follow-up post.
For I have valiantly done so, and one may even determine my exact physical address, as well as photographic identification via a few simple Google searches.

But, you see, because I tell the truth, I have nothing to fear through identification.
So, for me, it is a win/win situation.

Yet you, as an anonymous FREAKIN' LYING C**T, have two competing fears:
1) a fear of the shame of not revealing your true identity
and
2) the puerile fear contingent upon shame of revealing said identity,
and revealing to the blogosphere just what a pathetic whinging wanking wally weed that you really are.

For you, it is a lose/lose situation.
Wich dovetails perfectly with your repellent juvenile debating tactics.

OK, I assume that you are willing to make amends in the evidence department.

I assign a task that is designed to cut your skeptical milk-teeth.
Critically analyse my following two consecutive posts:

http://www.layscience.net/node/594#comment-39941
http://www.layscience.net/node/594#comment-39946

Provide a reasoned response to the points raised.
Give peer-reviewed references and citations to every substantial claim of fact.
Give your real, verifiable identity.

If you do, I shall respect you, and may even convert to your way of thinking.
If you falter on a significant number of these tasks, then I shall assume that you remain a cowardly wanker who's only real grasp on anything is not reality.

Its up to you. The ball is in your court.
I ask myself: is the anonymous (wo)man enough to rise to the challenge?

(Stop giggling, Zeno)

]]>