<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email #2 from the GCC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/email-2-from-the-gcc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/email-2-from-the-gcc/</link>
	<description>The random thoughts of a sceptical activist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zeno</title>
		<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/email-2-from-the-gcc/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>Zeno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=29#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments, David!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, David!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidp</title>
		<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/email-2-from-the-gcc/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>davidp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 03:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=29#comment-143</guid>
		<description>G&#039;day Zeno,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You asked for &#039;the complaints process&#039; but I think what you wanted was the normal procedure described in &#039;in line with our normal procedure&#039; that they used to justify asking for copies of whole web pages.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m amused that they are going in circles - you send the detailed claims, and presumably page locations. They ask  for the full web pages, you sent them and they ask for the detailed claims!.&lt;br /&gt;In part, I don&#039;t think they&#039;re coping with your level of thoroughness - complaining about something and identifying each of 195 pages on which it occurs, for example.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It will be hard work, and you&#039;ll probably end up swearing 254 individual witness statements, but I think it is worth doing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It certainly shows that the GCC does not seem to have actually kept its registered chiropractors following its rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#39;day Zeno,</p>
<p>You asked for &#39;the complaints process&#39; but I think what you wanted was the normal procedure described in &#39;in line with our normal procedure&#39; that they used to justify asking for copies of whole web pages.</p>
<p>I&#39;m amused that they are going in circles &#8211; you send the detailed claims, and presumably page locations. They ask  for the full web pages, you sent them and they ask for the detailed claims!.<br />In part, I don&#39;t think they&#39;re coping with your level of thoroughness &#8211; complaining about something and identifying each of 195 pages on which it occurs, for example.</p>
<p>It will be hard work, and you&#39;ll probably end up swearing 254 individual witness statements, but I think it is worth doing.</p>
<p>It certainly shows that the GCC does not seem to have actually kept its registered chiropractors following its rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.zenosblog.com/2009/06/email-2-from-the-gcc/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tricia.asmallorange.com/~zeno/?p=29#comment-141</guid>
		<description>Sure is a lot of legwork and hoops that they are making you jump through to make them follow their own guidelines and regulate themselves.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This strikes me as being about as effective as the police internal investigation into the Ian Tomlinson case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Great job on following through with all of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure is a lot of legwork and hoops that they are making you jump through to make them follow their own guidelines and regulate themselves.</p>
<p>This strikes me as being about as effective as the police internal investigation into the Ian Tomlinson case.</p>
<p>Great job on following through with all of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

